Finally made it down the right side - now to get the few bottom ones, then be on to the oasis...
Thursday, June 04, 2009
Tuesday, June 02, 2009
Sunday, May 31, 2009
"Vaulting" - 14
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
"Vaulting" - 13

After a break, due to out-of-town visiting for my b'day celebrating, am back at this, laying in the rear rock of the second oasis... am using old pens to get this lighter impressing, tho intend, once all are in, to use newer ones to create another, intermediate layer of rock on the right side, under the overhang space...
Friday, May 22, 2009
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Friday, May 08, 2009
Sunday, May 03, 2009
Saturday, May 02, 2009
Friday, May 01, 2009
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
"Vaulting" - 3
Saturday, April 25, 2009
"Vaulting" - 2
Friday, April 24, 2009
"Vaulting"
Publish Post
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Monday, April 13, 2009
"Runaway" - 4
"Runaway" - 3
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Wednesday, April 08, 2009
"Runaway"
It seems that, for now, my inner being seeks showing various still life visualizations - so am doing another variation on my 'bowl of cherries' motif, this time showing a smaller bowl filled, and a lone cherry way over on the right... again it will be colored pencil, tho the size is yet to be determined, even as it will likely remain the 20"x30" or even the 10"x20"... in any case, will try to concentrate more on the detail of the simple objects, even as they all come from my imagination...
Monday, April 06, 2009
"Rite of Spring" - 22
Thursday, April 02, 2009
Friday, March 27, 2009
"Respite" - 6
Added another layer of yellow ochre to the wall, along with tuscan red and light sepia [Polychromos], and is seen, of course, as well within the vase bowl... then shading with indigo blue on the florals, vase bowl, bowl, cup, and shelf... then beginning using the blender, as seen in a partial on the vase bowl, showing the difference...
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
"Respite" - 5
Turning to the vase bowl, used blue slate and true blue... and yellow ochre for the background wall... and added jade green and light aqua to the cup...there needs be another layering of the wall to match the layers within the bowl, then other colors will be added... and the chopsticks need now be defined crisply... oh yes, and white was added for the reflections on the bowl...
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
"Respite" - 4
Monday, March 23, 2009
"Respite" - 2
Sunday, March 22, 2009
"Respite" - WIP
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
The Moral View and Sense of Life
One of the things am coming to see, for the time being, is a need within me to doing more still-life renderings - not the usual flushed with loads of objects kind, but as have been at times doing, simple yet discrete objects all pertaining to specific themes, and all the themes of course being as aid to life enhancement, to the increase in grasping metaphoric relationships which broaden the awareness of how affirming to life many of the objects are taken to be without given conscious consideration... for the time being, this will mean smaller works, yet each a soothing and uplifting moment in the sense of life of being rewarded for the inherent goodness of being human and striving to utilize as much as possible that most human attribute - the reasoning mind... this is not to say am abandoning "Rite of Spring" - it'll continue, tho perhaps at a slower pace, partially because it is almost done, and it is a private rendering not likely for now to be able to be shown in exhibits... nor is it to say "Vaulting", the next landscape being readied to render, will be put off... merely that there will be moments of shifting in thought, relaxing moments, in which will do these small [9"x12"] renderings, then be back at the larger rendering...
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Rite - 20
Closing in on the trees, having now only 9 left to render out of over 60 some - which is why this has taken a wee longer to do, not in terms of hours on it so much as the on/off given to the stippling and the pain in my hand in so doing this... but - is is at last really beginning to look like a pen/ink painting, and there is again an increase in excitement at its progression...
Sunday, March 08, 2009
Moral Statements and rendering - Reviewed
From August '04...
It is my impression that those who claim that one cannot show much if anything of morals in a rendering, say such because they do not have a clear understanding of just what constitutes moral statements, other than thru literature... it is very instructive, therefore, to remember that ethics or morals is the science of VALUES... i know i've said this more than once, but it bears repeating - because most persons have a confused understanding of just morals or ethics consists of... VALUES are what a person seeks to gain and/or keep... they are acquired thru choices... but the only values really worth seeking are VIABLE values... when i gave that list of alternative things to look for in assessing a rendering, those were value expressions, and the answering of which of the alternatives expresses the morals involved - and these are indeed applicable to ANY rendering, including still-lifes... in fact, historically, still-lifes were the most profoundly expressed renderings involving morals, wherein the symbolisms were often very blatent, even if the morals expressed were factually anti-human - that is, not in the best interest or well-being of the person... there's more to this of course [there's ALWAYS more], but the point which should be kept in mind is to consider everything in terms of VALUES - what is chosen to be put in or left out, where, how big or little, how clear or obstuse, and so on... once there is the understanding that the moral or ethical is the viable values chosen, then it becomes clear where and how to see the expressings in the renderings...
It is my impression that those who claim that one cannot show much if anything of morals in a rendering, say such because they do not have a clear understanding of just what constitutes moral statements, other than thru literature... it is very instructive, therefore, to remember that ethics or morals is the science of VALUES... i know i've said this more than once, but it bears repeating - because most persons have a confused understanding of just morals or ethics consists of... VALUES are what a person seeks to gain and/or keep... they are acquired thru choices... but the only values really worth seeking are VIABLE values... when i gave that list of alternative things to look for in assessing a rendering, those were value expressions, and the answering of which of the alternatives expresses the morals involved - and these are indeed applicable to ANY rendering, including still-lifes... in fact, historically, still-lifes were the most profoundly expressed renderings involving morals, wherein the symbolisms were often very blatent, even if the morals expressed were factually anti-human - that is, not in the best interest or well-being of the person... there's more to this of course [there's ALWAYS more], but the point which should be kept in mind is to consider everything in terms of VALUES - what is chosen to be put in or left out, where, how big or little, how clear or obstuse, and so on... once there is the understanding that the moral or ethical is the viable values chosen, then it becomes clear where and how to see the expressings in the renderings...
Saturday, March 07, 2009
Figurelessness in Rendering - from earlier times of '04...
A second major aspect to rendering is when figures are NOT used, at least directly, but rather the effects of humanity are portrayed - either as still life, or as part of scapes [landscapes, seascapes, spacescapes, and so forth]... it is only when no figures or human effects are used that there can become a problem... this is because this absence of humanity is making a value-judgment, an expression of a fundamental view of humanity that says that humanity is not considered important enough to be in a landscape, etc., or that his/her presence is not considered to be a natural part of the world... this is, of course, a profoundly anti-human notion - even if it is not given thought to as being as such, or not intended as such... once again, however, knowing the nature and proper purpose of Art, and the rational ethics behind the purpose, allows that there can be a defense against it... yet - even as landscape, a case can be made on the 'benevolent universe' premise, thru the use of metaphoric personification... this has to do with the fact that 'man is the measure of all things' - in the nature of acquiring knowledge, and this is because measurement is an anthropocentric [man centered] process... the concretes, the specific images which a person directly grasps, are the basis and the standard to which everything else is related... if you add to that, that 'Art is not the means to literal transcription', and recognise that there is little need, if any, for rendering in a recorder mode, then thru personification there can be a pro-human stance given utilizing the non-human in the rendering...
Tuesday, March 03, 2009
Rite - 19
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Figures and Morality Reviewed
This from the past, August '04... worth looking at again...
Perhaps the most troubling aspect, when dealing with figures in a work, is whether or not to clothe them... most artists do not, as said, think in terms of the fact that whatever is included within a work is, by the fact that it is included, of fundamental importance... by the same token, what is NOT included is also making a statement of fundamental importance - the fact that it is not considered of major importance... clothing, even for an artist, is generally regarded as a norm... yet the fact that a naturalness - nudity - is being covered, is making a statement regarding one's relationship with the universe...as Rand pointed out, 'Art is not the means of literal transcription... this is the difference between a work of Art and a news story or a photograph.'... as such, what is shown in a work of Art pertains to one's fundamental view of a person's relationship to reality - which is why so many artists use the nude in their works, to establish the sense of universality, that what is shown pertains to all time... to a rational person, there is no problem - what is pro-human is to the good; what glorifies and/or accentuates human qualities is to the good [and a person's sexuality is very certainly a human quality] [and the first step towards showing that is portraying the naked figure]... the difficulty, then, lies in confronting the culture, which is, in many respects, in am anti-human viewing of one's self - thanks to the religions within it... because this has been the dominant - indeed, for most, the ONLY known code - there is difficulty in being able to mount a cognitive defense against it for most artists... even more confounding is being able to express sexuality of humans in a work - indeed, one would have less problems showing a bull mounting a cow than to humans lovemaking - and oddly enough, easier to show lovemaking than to showing explicit sexual arousal... in common parlance, this is called pornography - in fact, it is a religious attack on the sexual nature of human beings, and it is in knowing the nature and proper purpose of Art, and the rational ethics behind that purpose, that there can be a defense against this anti-human ranting...
Perhaps the most troubling aspect, when dealing with figures in a work, is whether or not to clothe them... most artists do not, as said, think in terms of the fact that whatever is included within a work is, by the fact that it is included, of fundamental importance... by the same token, what is NOT included is also making a statement of fundamental importance - the fact that it is not considered of major importance... clothing, even for an artist, is generally regarded as a norm... yet the fact that a naturalness - nudity - is being covered, is making a statement regarding one's relationship with the universe...as Rand pointed out, 'Art is not the means of literal transcription... this is the difference between a work of Art and a news story or a photograph.'... as such, what is shown in a work of Art pertains to one's fundamental view of a person's relationship to reality - which is why so many artists use the nude in their works, to establish the sense of universality, that what is shown pertains to all time... to a rational person, there is no problem - what is pro-human is to the good; what glorifies and/or accentuates human qualities is to the good [and a person's sexuality is very certainly a human quality] [and the first step towards showing that is portraying the naked figure]... the difficulty, then, lies in confronting the culture, which is, in many respects, in am anti-human viewing of one's self - thanks to the religions within it... because this has been the dominant - indeed, for most, the ONLY known code - there is difficulty in being able to mount a cognitive defense against it for most artists... even more confounding is being able to express sexuality of humans in a work - indeed, one would have less problems showing a bull mounting a cow than to humans lovemaking - and oddly enough, easier to show lovemaking than to showing explicit sexual arousal... in common parlance, this is called pornography - in fact, it is a religious attack on the sexual nature of human beings, and it is in knowing the nature and proper purpose of Art, and the rational ethics behind that purpose, that there can be a defense against this anti-human ranting...
Rite - 16
Friday, February 13, 2009
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Rite - 14
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




a.jpg)
b.jpg)
a.jpg)
a.jpg)
a.jpg)
a.jpg)
a.jpg)
b.jpg)












